PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LRNZ vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LRNZ and ^GSPC is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

LRNZ vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
3.83%
7.31%
LRNZ
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LRNZ:

0.24

^GSPC:

1.90

Sortino Ratio

LRNZ:

0.52

^GSPC:

2.54

Omega Ratio

LRNZ:

1.06

^GSPC:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

LRNZ:

0.16

^GSPC:

2.87

Martin Ratio

LRNZ:

0.81

^GSPC:

11.84

Ulcer Index

LRNZ:

7.96%

^GSPC:

2.06%

Daily Std Dev

LRNZ:

26.95%

^GSPC:

12.86%

Max Drawdown

LRNZ:

-61.38%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

LRNZ:

-28.09%

^GSPC:

-2.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRNZ achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 1.16% return.


LRNZ

YTD

1.70%

1M

-5.50%

6M

1.38%

1Y

6.40%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

1.16%

1M

-2.04%

6M

6.47%

1Y

24.84%

5Y*

12.36%

10Y*

11.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LRNZ vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRNZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LRNZ is 1818
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LRNZ is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LRNZ is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LRNZ is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LRNZ is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LRNZ is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LRNZ vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LRNZ, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.241.90
The chart of Sortino ratio for LRNZ, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.522.54
The chart of Omega ratio for LRNZ, currently valued at 1.06, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.061.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for LRNZ, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.162.87
The chart of Martin ratio for LRNZ, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.000.8111.84
LRNZ
^GSPC

The current LRNZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRNZ and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.24
1.90
LRNZ
^GSPC

Drawdowns

LRNZ vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRNZ drawdown since its inception was -61.38%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRNZ and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-28.09%
-2.30%
LRNZ
^GSPC

Volatility

LRNZ vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 4.97%. This indicates that LRNZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
8.22%
4.97%
LRNZ
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab